Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ekaterina Makarova (1996) vs Annick Melgers Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our (1996) vs Melgers analysis and find out who is favored!
Ekaterina Makarova (1996) vs Annick Melgers Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: (1996) 1 - 0 Melgers
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), (1996) has won 42.49% of points on their second serve, while Melgers has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show (1996), in recent form, has won 55.01% of their opponent's second serve points, while Melgers has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.33% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: (1996) has saved 49.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Melgers has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year (1996) has won 55.17% of matches played (W/L 48/ 39), with Melgers winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: (1996) has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 54/ 34), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Melgers has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 8/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, (1996) has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.58% of matches (W/L 38/ 28), where as Melgers has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with (1996) winning 1 times and Melgers being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with (1996) winning 2 and Melgers winning 0. The last match between (1996) and Melgers was at the W15 Alkmaar, 22-06-2021, First, Clay with Ekaterina Makarova (1996) getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: (1996) and Melgers have played a deciding set 0 times, with (1996) winning 0 times and Melgers 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with (1996) winning 0, and Melgers 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, (1996) has played against opponents with an average rank of 288.24 while Melgers has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, (1996) has won 72% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Melgers has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, (1996) has converted 53.6% of breakpoint opportunities, and Melgers has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
182
Rank
158
High
28
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
57% (218-166)
Career Total W/L
44% (54-70)
39% (13-20)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$15,301
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Ekaterina Makarova (1996) vs Annick Melgers For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For (1996) VS Melgers
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Ekaterina Makarova (1996) | Annick Melgers |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:9:0 | 1:9:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (25/41) | 47% (29/62) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (16/25) | 55% (16/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (10/16) | 30% (10/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 58% (36/62) | 37% (15/41) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Annick Melgers
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
29 of
62)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ekaterina Makarova (1996) | Annick Melgers |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 39% (13/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 39% (30/47) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (303/368) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 48% (11/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.03 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 10 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.44 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 143 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:46 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 287.76 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1464/2271) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 52% (758/1464) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (340/807) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (151/286) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (1021/2140) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (8/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (13/32) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (8/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (24/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Ekaterina Makarova (1996) Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
73%
(
83 of
114)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
46%
(
45 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
114)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Margaux Rouvroy
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
1
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
48%
(
30 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Nahia Berecoechea
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brenda Fruhvirtova
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
56
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Julia Avdeeva
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
32%
(
11 of
34)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
9
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
51
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Amarissa Kiara Toth
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
74%
(
68 of
92)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
1
49%
(
33 of
67)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
55%
(
53 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
52 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
75%
(
40 of
53)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Selena Janicijevic
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
46%
(
26 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Annick Melgers Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tereza Dejnozkova
Player
Annick Melgers
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chiraz Bechri
Player
Annick Melgers
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
25%
(
3 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
51%
(
26 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Annick Melgers
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
Player
Annick Melgers
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
44 of
76)
86
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Annick Melgers
Player
Bente Spee
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alba Rey Garcia
Player
Annick Melgers
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
14 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
49
Total Points Won
43
|
7-6(1) ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Annick Melgers
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
29 of
62)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicole Fossa Huergo
Player
Annick Melgers
62%
(
63 of
102)
1st Serve %
48%
(
46 of
96)
-
Aces
-
11
Double Faults
6
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(6) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
(1996) Vs Melgers Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of (1996) are available here and Melgers photos here.
-h2h-profile.webp "(1996) Melgers H2h Summary Stats 21st June 2024")
-h2h-stats.webp "Ekaterina Makarova (1996) Annick Melgers Prediction Stats")
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
